Solutions for Korea, the Ukraine, Israel/Palestine

Shall be published over the next couple days. They are based on the geo-economic regions described in NEW ROMES, and assumes implementation of systems ROYAL DECA and TETRARK, as well as THE FLEET & COMMAND, and a new global currency/exchange system. In the meantime, a summary here of the regional solutions for the Koreas, the Ukraine, Israel/Palestine until individually published:

Koreas:

Korea is expanded into a very large region called Overkingdom Eodeia. The potential reaction, that this sounds fantastical / fictional, is precisely why the Korean War goes on. A stalemate not just in politics and weapons, but descriptions, words, namings, etc. Luckily, the words have permanent rooting in my family’s ancestral land at the Han River delta. As goes unstated in modern media, the Han River delta (at the DMZ) correlates with the geologic seam joining the two largest geologic regimes of earth: the Eurasian Plate and the Pacific Plate (tectonic plates). This is another way of saying, minerals. The ancestral location, the central and epicenter location to all other locations and regions, and also designated Fourth Rome (next in line to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd Romes of history).

Overkingdom Eodeia is comprised of the Korea peninsula itself, extending a bit into the Korean-inhabitated regions of China and also to include Vladivostok Russia, the Pacific terminus of the continental Trans-Siberian rail across Russia. From Vladivostok across the Pacific to encompass Alaska, Seattle, Hawaii. Again, one can regard this as a geo-economic zone, as in fact is it geologically based, i.e., the aforementioned Pacific tectonic plate and portions of the Eurasian tectonic plate.

The Korean peninsula itself is delineated into 9 Commandery regions, 5 generally north of the geologic belt, 4 to the south. Thus approximately North and South Korea. In the north, Commanderies Pyongyang, Kumgang, Jangjin, Paektu, Amur. In the south, Commanderies Han River, Shin, Busan, Rikharthu. The solution was first presented in 2021, based on a previous iteration. Unfortunately has the solution not been able to be implemented due to extenunating circumstances. In any case, the Korea solution shall be published in greater detail in /SOLUTIONS.

In the meantime, see image below of the kind of re-zoning that will occur per geologic and other considerations. This is map sketched in 2021 of the contested waters between Korea and Japan. The depicted channels coming off each of the 9 Commandery regions (5 depicted here) shall serve to diffuse trade / travel tensions with Japan, taking the onus off of the nation-state to settle matters. This has not proven fruitful in the past century.

As few Americans are aware, Korea and Japan are historic enemies, masked by the South Korea-US alliance since 1961. Thus did the U.S. simply see all the waters east of South Korea and Japan, as one maritime bloc. However were simmering tensions below the surface. Again, does the delineation by 9 serve the purpose to diffuse, while simultaneously present new opportunities in Japan to see Korea 9 different new ways — and 9 new opportunities of engagement in trade, economics, cultural exchange, etc.

The Ukraine:

The Korea solution, particularly with its epicenter status, is template for 3-part solution in the Ukraine. Already have comparisons been made to the Koreas, that the Ukraine seems to be heading towards an indefinite stalemate.

There are structural reasons for the Korean stalemate, but also royal reasons. The royal reason shall be briefly described in the Koreas solution, but is extensively described in the soon published solution, TWO SEATS.

The structural reason for the Korean War — or any stalemate situation — is the dynamic of two sides trapped in tug of war. There is either complete victory on one side with complete loss on the other, or both sides in perpetual standoff. The complete victory in the age of nuclear weapons is not a victory anyone actually wants, what an ancient Greek philosopher once called a Pyrrhic victory.

Korea is presented a “third” solution via the aforementioned Fourth Rome. This is a win-win solution for both North and South Korea. The positive effect is not only cemented in perpetuity and guarantee by the ancient permanent land at the Han River delta, but reinforced in positive rippling effect via Overkingdom Eodeia, and all other regions. Fourth Rome, however, provides the underwriting — that is, in geologic permanence, not to mention, ancient family history. I.e., the vested interest in centuries of history, and in fact, the one that goes all the way back to ancient Zhou Dynasty China, in the time of Confucius.

There is no foreign policy, no U.S. State Department solution that has ever been intrinsically accompanied with an underwriting guarantee, either in geologic fact, geographic permanence, or history prior to its own founding in the late 1700s — the time at this point, when Korea was already several thousand years old. The Korean War needs a more permanent guarantee than 200 years — not to mention, the revolving-door nature of U.S. politics.

The same holds true for the Ukraine. The histories that originate in geology. However, became of particular contentious status in the late 10th century, per the founder of Russia, Vladimir the Great, the Grand Prince of Kiev. This is the contested history that drives the current conflict.

The U.S. hegemony does not have say in who can claim Kievan history. The Ukraine is a nation of only 30+ years of age. Whatever histories it had centuries ago, are histories that precede the U.S. nation’s conception of history.

All debate aside, as readers might detect a bias in my words, does not change the stalemate fate of the Ukraine without an external solution — the one that would not arrive in order to exploit the Ukraine, nor to take sides. Thus while my royal knowledge of the situation should lend me to recommend the whole of the Ukraine be returned to Russia, this is not practical.

What is practical, is compromise — but not in the untenable manner of tug-of-war with the Ukraine divided in two. Instead, the solution that called for a ‘third'‘ solution, that shall be neutral.

However is neutrality not enough, as the Ukraine has been subject to push-and-pull between small and large actors for centuries — including by the United States beginning in the 19th century. This regards its dealings with the Tsars of Russia at the time (Alexander II, Alexander II, Nicholas II), and the turning event of the West’s invasion of Crimea in 1853.

Thus must neutrality be grounded in something … else. An external factor to present an underwriting force. The best kind is the one that preceded any nation’s formation — the one established in geologic and geographic permanence. This is achieved by underwriting it via the same place the Korean War peace would also be underwritten, at Fourth Rome. Thus would the peace naturally come into the best interest of the same parties driving the Korean War.

Not coincidentally, the same parties that set Korea asunder in 1945 (Potsdam Conference at end of WW2) are the same parties that are at odds in Kiev today: the US and Soviet Union now Russia.

Russia has re-occupied key areas of the eastern part of the Ukraine. The western side abuts nations Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Moldova. Kiev the capital, sits in the northern middle.

Thus shall the Ukraine be delineated into a Western Ukraine, an Eastern Ukraine, and a Kiev region in the center., which I call a Citadel.

A new kind of “city on the hill” as was present in the ancient Roman empire, and evokes the framing and vernacular of Fourth Rome.

The underwriting in the far-off region of Korea is not as far-off as it seems. Korea and Kiev, despite being geographically quite far apart, are bound by a history unknown in the West, of the 13th century time of Crusades. This is described at great length in TWO SEATS.

Again, the 3-part solution that assumes implementation of Royal Deca, Tetrark, The Fleet & Command, and global currency/exchange system.

The lengthier description of the solution shall be published soon. In the meantime, the actual main hill of Kiev overlooking the Dniepr River where rises a statue of St. Vladimir.

The segmentation of Vladimir the Great vs St. Vladimir into camps of Russia vs the Ukraine (as described below) is impossible to unpack if relying on U.S. media. Instead is the history the one of a single historic thread — Vladimir the Great into St. Vladimir that led to the conquest of the Mongols by Ivan the Great to make the history of Russia — is a far longer thread than the U.S. audience typically has patience for. However is it understood through the royal viewpoint, particularly by the Korean royal that traveled to Kiev in the 13th century. The Korean royal history is described at length in TWO SEATS.

Israel - Palestine:

Now to the regional conflict that most people consider the most complex of the regional challenges. However in fact, is it impossible to solve without first solving the Korean War, then the Ukraine matter.

Geology and geography, once again, provides us the reason why. The reason that precedes the formation of any nation-state, by several hundred millions of years.

The region, for the sake of easier writing, I shall simply call what in fact it should be renamed: another Overkingdom.

Specifically, Overkingdom XIII. The “13”, allusion to the legend that came out of the Crusades, the Knights of the Round Table, of which there were said to be 12.

As the Crusades is the fraught history between Christian and Muslims, does 13 signify a moving beyond.

Overkingdom XIII shall be a geo-economic region extending beyond the immediate area considered to be Israel / Palestine, into the Mediterranean. This shall include Cyprus and Rhodes. Both, the islands that came to be associated with the two most well-known Knight organizations of the Crusades: the Knights Templar and Knights Hospitaller.

The extension into the Mediterranean automatically expands the perspective. This addresses the fact that inside actors often become unable to see “out of the box”. By the simple geographic fact that the Mediterranean is never mentioned when discussing the conflicts of the region, do we know the untapped solutions that lie therein.

This is no insult to the actors of the region. The ancient history of the Jews is inseparable from the one of the Roman Empire, whose reach indeed expanded by way of the Mediterranean.

Thus instead of Romans looking east — now we look west. From shores where once fought Crusaders called today as Tel Aviv, Acre / Akko, Gaza — the regions to no longer just look at each other as enemies. A new perspective now, and look west, to the sea.

Like the Korean peninsula, in addition to an expansion into larger waters, the land region is re-delineated into Commanderies.

9 regions, by the names and regions: Commanderies Israel, Hebron, Nazarene, Jordan, Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Gaza, Judah, Samaria. Two of the Commanderies shall be considered pre-eminent and more powerful than the others: Israel and Hebron, and led by the renown persons associated with Israel and Palestine.

In the manner that the 9 Commanderies (and maritime regions) diffuse matters across several actors/regions, does the same apply here. This creates opportunity to the many actors in the region, including Hamas, Hezbollah stakeholders of Jordan, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Türkiye, Kuwait, Bahrain. Implicitly, Egypt, Qatar. And of course, KSA, UAE. These are the key regional stakeholders.

The solution assumes implementation of Royal Deca, Tetrark, The Fleet and Command, and global currency/exchange system.

The establishment of Overkingdom XIII shall have positive effect on adjacent regions, such as head towards Yemen where are based the Houthi.

It is quite striking really, how untapped in potential are the exiting waters of the gulfs of the Middle East, which can provide new economic, trade opportunities and also marine research, cultural exchange and more. As an economics-development major, my viewpoint of peace is not only based on histories of diplomacy, but indeed, on the practical matter of economics. And the belief that all humans deserve to have a stake in their economic futures.

Nonetheless, all that risks becoming another confusing war of many players, if not for an external grounding force: the place of Korea on the other side of the Eurasian continent.

Korea which arrived to the Middle East in the 13th century during the Mongol invasions concurrent to the Crusades. As few in the U.S. know, the Mongols battled in the area known as Ain Jalud, which sits southeast of Mount Carmel.

Korea arrived in “external” manner, and there established minerals-trade relations with local stakeholders. The history untold in common Western history, and yet no more unusual than the Roman Empire arriving in the area, a few centuries before.

However unlike Rome, did not arrive to conquer — but by the larger perspective of the East. And by a centuries-long history in diplomacy with China.

Korea, that provided an underwriting of peace that prevented further Mongol incursion past Ain Jalud, discouraging Mongol campaigns westward into Western Europe. The Mongols otherwise, who conquered a territory that dwarfs the Roman Empire in size. The untold history is described at length in TWO SEATS.

Ultimately, peace in the Israel/Palestine region is impossible when seeing the region as a tug of war between two forces alone, pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian.

The key, counter-intuitively, is to think as the Romans might have — and as Korea did too. I.e., not in argument of the issues per se, but in mindset of geography and stage. And to set a wider, broader one, than before.

Thus, to see a background “third” element to the area once conquered by Rome. Now by way of Fourth Rome.

Fourth Rome, the Rome that is not “Rome” in the known manner of Roman Empire, in war.

Instead, the manner of peace. Not to mention, the underwriting of peace possible because unlike Israel/Palestine, Korea is the geology of minerals.

Later in history came the Industrial Revolution and mass-assembly production. The Middle East came to be known as the land of oil. However has the era of automobiles and oil now given way to the era of technology and minerals.

However as all answers cannot just be about minerals, come the larger reasons that drive the human race. The basic matters of Male, Female, as begun to be described in ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN et al.

The matters introduced in the West, via the very stories fought over to this day: those of Genesis, the Old Testament, New Testament and books of the Abrahamic faiths. A new perspective is presented in TWO SEATS — the perspective that expands the narrative to include the entire world.

There, where is described how religion must answer the largest question of our times. The ultimate question, Why.

Why are we here.

Why, that cannot be answered by considering one area alone. Why that must have applicability to the whole planet earth.

The question, thus unanswerable without answering the intertwined matters of war that have written human history since — including by way of St. George.

The matters addressed in their totality, and presented on this website, Rosehouse.org.

The 3 regional solutions shall be published over the next couple days.